ϼ

ENERGY

New Mexico regulators order Blackstone, TXNM to unwind $400 million stock sale

The commission voted 2-1 Thursday to follow a June recommendation from hearing examiners

Published Modified

New Mexico regulators on Thursday moved to unravel a $400 million stock sale that gave Blackstone Inc. a foothold in the state’s largest electric utility, ruling that the transaction should have gone through a review process it never received.

The three-member New Mexico Public Regulation Commission voted 2-1 on the order, siding with hearing examiners who recommended in early June that commissioners reverse the sale of 8 million shares of TXNM Energy Inc. stock to Blackstone. The sale gave the private equity firm a 7.59% stake in TXNM.

The companies must show within 45 days that they are complying with the order. The order includes $100,000 in fines against TXNM and $200,000 against Blackstone affiliates.

The vote is a major setback for Blackstone’s efforts to acquire TXNM, which is the parent company of Public Service Company of New Mexico. The commission did not ask Blackstone and TXNM to refile their acquisition application itself, as some parties had requested. 

Instead, the commission late Thursday published an order that alters the procedural schedule of the case, which was set to begin in mid-August.

New Energy Economy Executive Director Mariel Nanasi, an intervenor in the case, said the order cancels hearings tied to that schedule, meaning that the commission will likely not be able to decide on the case by the end of the year.

“Another huge victory today — and possibly the nail in the coffin” for the deal, she said.

The hearing examiners in their June report said the transaction violated a law prohibiting utility mergers without prior approval from the PRC. TXNM and Blackstone argued the stock sale was not connected to the proposed $11.5 billion sale of the energy-holding company, which was filed with state regulators in August.

Neither Blackstone nor TXNM answered whether they would proceed with the acquisition or how they would unwind the stock transaction. Blackstone declined to comment. A TXNM spokesperson said the company is evaluating its options.

“It is important to us that our customers know that the stock issuance was completed in good faith, publicly disclosed well in advance and undertaken with no intent to circumvent any rules or regulatory requirements,” TXNM spokesperson Lisa Goodman said.

In a statement, the commission said parties will have a chance to comment on the compliance filing before determining “the appropriate procedural path for the acquisition case.”

Regulatory compact 

Commissioners Pat O’Connell and Gabriel Aguilera voted in favor of enforcing the hearing examiners’ recommended decision. 

Greg Nibert voted against the proposal, saying that requiring the companies to unwind the stock sale will harm TXNM’s finances — and by extension more than half a million ratepayers in the state.

But Nibert’s argument did not prevail.

“You’ve got to follow the law or else the regulatory compact doesn’t work,” O’Connell said.

Don Tarry, president and CEO of TXNM, in June testified to the commission that TXNM has already used the $400 million in proceeds from the stock sale. 

“Specifically, among other things, this funding was used to pay down TXNM debt (and) to provide equity contributions and term loans” for PNM and Texas-New Mexico Power Co., Tarry said.  

Albuquerque nonprofit Prosperity Works filed a motion earlier this year saying the stock transaction violated New Mexico law, triggering a review of the issue by the commission. 

Steven Michel, a Santa Fe lawyer who represented the nonprofit before the commission, pointed to a $350 million termination fee baked into the agreement that requires Blackstone to pay TXNM that amount under certain circumstances.

“They’ve never not been able to raise capital,” he said when asked about concerns that unwinding the sale will harm TXNM’s credit.

Dozens of protesters who oppose the proposed sale gathered outside the Roundhouse before the hearing began. The hearing had to be moved to a larger room inside the Roundhouse to accommodate the audience.

The commission chair asked the audience how many people supported the deal. Nobody raised their hands. 

“Ensure that New Mexicans don’t have to pay money to these billionaires,” Sadie Gónzales Root told commissioners. “Don’t let the bad guys win.”

The only support for the deal came from some elected officials. 

Rep. Meredith Dixon, an Albuquerque Democrat, said she supported the acquisition, calling it an “economic-development driver.” 

“This investment creates the long-term stability needed to grow the company,” Dixon said. 

Sen. Gabriel Ramos, a Republican from Silver City, said he supports the merger because Blackstone will provide money “to stabilize our infrastructure.”

Stephanie Telles, an Albuquerque city councilor, said she did not support the merger.
“Before the deal has even been approved, they’ve already demonstrated a willingness to ignore the laws that govern them,” she said.

Justin Horwath covers tech and energy for the Journal. You can reach him at jhorwath@abqjournal.com