Judge upholds state law aimed at election transparency
Published
Modified
A federal judge on Friday upheld the constitutionality of a 2019 state law aimed at better informing voters about who is spending money to influence an election.
Two nonprofit advocacy groups, including the New Mexico-based Rio Grande Foundation, argued the law, which requires more disclosure of dark-money political spending, violated their donors鈥� First Amendment rights to anonymous free speech and freedom of association.
The libertarian-leaning foundation and the Illinois Opportunity Project of Chicago filed a lawsuit in December 2019 challenging the law, contending it would have a chilling effect on potential donors.
But Senior U.S. District Judge Judith C. Herrera ruled that the New Mexico Secretary of State, in defending the law, showed that New Mexico 鈥渉as an important interest in informing voters about who is making large contributions to pay for advertisements about candidates and ballot measures shortly before elections.鈥�
The 2019 law applies to nonprofit organizations that don鈥檛 normally have to disclose their donors like candidates and political action committees do.
Such groups must report their spending and the contributors involved when they spend above a certain threshold near an election. They also must put a sponsorship label on their materials.
The Rio Grande Foundation鈥檚 lawsuit argued that the disclosure requirements 鈥渋mpose a substantial burden on its First Amendment rights because the loss of donor support is real,鈥欌�� Herrera鈥檚 ruling stated. The Foundation had said that it fears if its donors are disclosed, they may be subject to retaliation and harassment by intolerant members of society.
The foundation said it knew of several donors that would not continue to support the organization if they were subject to disclosure. But Herrera, in her ruling, noted that the foundation 鈥渁dmits ... that it is not aware of any harassment or retaliation of its employees or donors in its over 20-year history.鈥�
The judge said there was 鈥渢oo little evidence鈥� that the law would have a chilling effect.
Proponents of the law have argued that it is an important transparency step that would make more information available to voters.
A spokesman for the Secretary of State鈥檚 office wasn鈥檛 immediately available Friday afternoon. The Rio Grande Foundation鈥檚 president, Paul Gessing, also could not be reached for comment.
